Correctness conditions for property nominalists

Abstract Nominalists need some account of correctness for sentences committed to the existence abstract objects. This paper proposes a new statement such conditions specifically properties. The builds on an earlier proposal mine, but avoids counter-examples against latter pointed out by Thomas Schindler, particularly, sentence ‘There are inexpressible properties’. I argue that is independently motivated and more faithful spirit kind error-theoretic nominalism original was part of. Along way, also propose novel treatments Arthur Pap’s W.V.O. Quine’s notoriously hard-to-paraphrase about abstracta.